World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article


A Taser, with cartridge removed, making an electric arc between its two electrodes
Police issue X26 Taser with cartridge installed

A Taser or conducted electrical weapon (CEW)[1] is an electroshock weapon sold by Taser International. It fires two small dart-like electrodes, which stay connected to the main unit by conductors, to deliver electric current to disrupt voluntary control of muscles causing "neuromuscular incapacitation".[2][3] Someone struck by a Taser experiences stimulation of his/her sensory nerves and motor nerves, resulting in strong involuntary muscle contractions. Tasers rely on pain compliance, especially when used in "Drive Stun" mode, and are thus preferred by some law enforcement over non-Taser stun guns and other electronic control weapons.[4][5][6]

Tasers were introduced as non-lethal weapons for police to use to subdue fleeing, belligerent, or potentially dangerous people, who would have otherwise been subjected to more lethal weapons such as firearms. A 2009 Police Executive Research Forum study said that officer injuries drop by 76% when a Taser is used.[7] However, while Taser CEO Rick Smith has stated that police surveys show that the device has saved 75,000 lives,[7] there has been some controversy where Tasers have been implicated in instances of serious injury or death.[8][9]

Although some other companies have produced similar devices (e.g., Raysun X1),[10][11] their significance as of 2014 is still marginal.


  • History 1
  • Function 2
    • Drive Stun 2.1
    • Models 2.2
    • Accessories 2.3
  • Users 3
    • Legality 3.1
      • Argentina 3.1.1
      • Australia 3.1.2
      • Austria 3.1.3
      • Brazil 3.1.4
      • Canada 3.1.5
      • Czech Republic 3.1.6
      • Finland 3.1.7
      • France 3.1.8
      • Germany 3.1.9
      • Greece 3.1.10
      • Hong Kong 3.1.11
      • Iceland 3.1.12
      • Ireland 3.1.13
      • Israel 3.1.14
      • Kenya 3.1.15
      • Malaysia 3.1.16
      • New Zealand 3.1.17
      • Sweden 3.1.18
      • United Kingdom 3.1.19
      • United States 3.1.20
  • Safety concerns 4
  • Excited delirium 5
  • Use in schools and on children 6
  • Use in torture 7
  • See also 8
  • References 9
  • External links 10


Jack Cover, a NASA researcher, began developing the Taser in 1969.[12] By 1974, Cover had completed the device, which he named after his childhood hero Tom Swift ("Thomas A. Swift's electric rifle").[13] The Taser Public Defender used gunpowder as its propellant, which led the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms to classify it as a firearm in 1976.[14][15] The backformed verb "to tase" is used sometimes.

Taser International CEO Patrick Smith has testified in a Taser-related lawsuit that the catalyst for the development of the device was the "shooting death of two of his high school acquaintances" by a "guy with a legally licensed gun who lost his temper".[16] In 1993, Rick Smith and his brother Thomas began to investigate what they called "safer use of force option[s] for citizens and law enforcement". At their Scottsdale, Arizona, facilities, the brothers worked with the "...original Taser inventor, Jack Cover" to develop a "non-firearm Taser electronic control device".[17] The 1994 Air Taser Model 34000 had an "anti-felon identification (AFID) system" to prevent the likelihood that the device would be used by criminals; upon use, it released many small pieces of paper containing the serial number of the Taser device. The U.S. firearms regulator, the ATF, stated that the Air Taser was not a firearm. In 1999, Taser International developed an "...ergonomically handgun-shaped device called the Advanced Taser M-series systems," which used a "...patented neuromuscular incapacitation (NMI) technology." In May 2003, Taser International released a new weapon called the Taser X26, which used "shaped pulse technology." On July 27, 2009 Taser International released a new type of Taser called the X3, which can fire three shots before reloading. It holds three new type cartridges, which are much thinner than the previous model.


The M-26 Taser, the United States military version of a commercial Taser

The Taser fires two small dart-like electrodes, which stay connected to the main unit by conductive wire as they are propelled by small compressed nitrogen charges.[18][19] The air cartridge contains a pair of electrodes and propellant for a single shot and is replaced after each use. There are a number of cartridges designated by range, with the maximum at 35 feet (10.6 m).[19] Cartridges available to non-law enforcement consumers are limited to 15 feet (4.5 m).[20] The electrodes are pointed to penetrate clothing and barbed to prevent removal once in place. Earlier Taser models had difficulty in penetrating thick clothing, but newer versions (X26, C2) use a "shaped pulse" that increases effectiveness in the presence of barriers.[21]

Tasers also provide a safety benefit to police officers, as they have a greater deployment range than batons, pepper spray or empty hand techniques. This allows police to maintain a safe distance. A study of use-of-force incidents by the Calgary Police Service conducted by the Canadian Police Research Centre found that the use of Tasers resulted in fewer injuries than the use of batons or empty hand techniques. The study found that only pepper spray was a safer intervention option.[22]

Drive Stun

Some Taser models, particularly those used by police departments, also have a "Drive Stun" capability, where the Taser is held against the target without firing the projectiles, and is intended to cause pain without incapacitating the target. "Drive Stun" is "the process of using the EMD (Electro Muscular Disruption) weapon [Taser] as a pain compliance technique. This is done by activating the Taser and placing it against an individual’s body. This can be done without an air cartridge in place or after an air cartridge has been deployed."[23]

Guidelines released in 2011 in the U.S. recommend that use of Drive Stun as a pain compliance technique be avoided.[24] The guidelines were issued by a joint committee of the Police Executive Research Forum and the U.S. Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services. The guidelines state "Using the ECW to achieve pain compliance may have limited effectiveness and, when used repeatedly, may even exacerbate the situation by inducing rage in the subject."

A study of U.S. police and sheriff departments found that 29.6% of the jurisdictions allowed the use of Drive Stun for gaining compliance in a passive resistance arrest scenario, with no physical contact between the officer and the subject. For a scenario that also includes non-violent physical contact, this number is 65.2%.[25]

A Las Vegas police document says "The Drive Stun causes significant localized pain in the area touched by the Taser, but does not have a significant effect on the central nervous system. The Drive Stun does not incapacitate a subject but may assist in taking a subject into custody."[26] "Drive Stun" was used in the UCLA Taser incident and the University of Florida Taser incident (which popularized the widespread use of the phrase "Don't Tase me, bro!").

Amnesty International has expressed particular concern about Drive Stun, noting that "… the potential to use Tasers in drive-stun mode—where they are used as 'pain compliance' tools when individuals are already effectively in custody—and the capacity to inflict multiple and prolonged shocks, renders the weapons inherently open to abuse."[27]


There are two main models, the M26 and X26. Both come with accessories including a laser sight and optional mounted digital video camera that can record in low-light situations. Taser International sells a civilian model called the C2. On 27 July 2009, TASER introduced the X3, capable of firing three times without reload.[28][29]
In 2011, TASER International released the TASER X2 Defender.


The Taser Cam is a specialized device designed for the Taser X26 to record audio and video when the Taser's safety is disengaged. The cam is integrated into a battery pack and does not interfere with the Taser's existing function.[30]


Taser use in Phoenix increased from 71 incidents in 2002 to 164 incidents in 2003. In Houston, however, police shootings did not decline after the deployment of thousands of Tasers.[31]

According to the analysis of the first 900 police Taser incidents by the Houston Chronicle, no crime was being committed and no person was charged in 350 of those cases.[31] In addition, it has been reported that the Houston Police Department has "shot, wounded, and killed as many people as before the widespread use of the stun guns" and has used Tasers in situations that would not warrant lethal or violent force, such as "traffic stops, disturbance and nuisance complaints, and reports of suspicious people."

In Portland, Oregon, meanwhile, police found that 25% to 30% of the situations in which police used a Taser met the criteria for the use of deadly force.[32]

In 2005, the American Civil Liberties Union stated that at least 148 people had died in the United States and Canada since 1999 after being shocked with Tasers by police officers,[33] and Amnesty International stated that the number reached 500 in 2012.[34]

A 2009 development has included marketing Tasers to the general public. A line of pink Tasers are specifically being marketed for women. The Taser website states "Who says safety can't be stylish?" in reference to its "latest designer TASER C2 colors" and patterns, which include leopard print patterns and a range of colors.[35]

An episode of the British reality TV show. Police Interceptors or a similar series showed police finding suspects in a car who were in illegal possession of Tasers which were several times more powerful then British police official issue Tasers.



In 2010, one court ruled against the use of five imported Tasers by the Buenos Aires local police, to comply with a claim from the "Human Rights Observatorium", that states that Tasers are considered an instrument of torture by NGOs and the Committee against Torture of the UN.[36]


Possession, ownership and use of a stun gun (including Tasers) by civilians is considerably restricted, if not illegal in all States and Territories. The importation into Australia is restricted with permits being required.

Stun gun use in Australian law enforcement is as follows:


Austria allows police to use stun guns, including Tasers. After using a Taser, police must immediately call for an ambulance. The victim must be medically checked directly at the place of the shooting, and only a medically trained person may remove the darts. From 2006 to 2012, Austrian police used Tasers 133 times—127 against humans and six against dogs. About 1,000 police officers were permitted in 2012 to carry and use a Taser.[39]


Use of the Taser is legal for the police. Its use is widespread mainly in the Guardas Municipais (Municipal Guards), who receive professional training in the use of electro-conductive pistols. Tasers are also used by military police and specialized forces. There are laws allowing their use by private security companies, but such use is unusual because of the expense of maintaining a Taser compared with an ordinary gun.


According to previous interpretation of the Firearms Act, Tasers were considered "prohibited weapons" and could be used only by members of law-enforcement agencies after they were imported into the country under a special permit. The possession of restricted weapons must be licensed by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) Canadian Firearms Program unless exempted by law.[40] A 2008 review of the Firearms Act found that the act classifies "the Taser Public Defender and any variant or modified version of it" as "prohibited firearms". However, Canadian police forces typically treat Tasers as "prohibited weapons", inconsistent with the restrictions on firearms.[41]

The direct source for this information comes from an independent report produced by Compliance Strategy Group[42] for the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. The report is called An Independent Review of the Adoption and Use of Conducted Energy Weapons by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.[43] In the report that is available through access to information, the authors argued that the CEW was, for several years after its adoption by the RCMP, erroneously characterized as a prohibited "weapon" under the Criminal Code, as opposed to a prohibited "firearm". This misunderstanding was subsequently incorporated into the RCMP's operational policies and procedures as well as those of other police services in Canada.

While the most recent RCMP operational manual, completed in 2007, correctly refers to the CEW as a prohibited firearm, a number of consequences of this error in classification remain to be dealt with, by both the RCMP and other Canadian police services.[44] Consequently, it could be argued the police in Canada may not have had the proper authority under their provincial policing Acts and Regulation to use the CEW in the first place. The point of unauthorized use by the police was also raised by Dirk Ryneveld, British Columbia's Police Complaint Commissioner at the Braidwood inquiry on June 25, 2008. Taser safety and issues have been extensively rehearsed and investigated after the Robert Dziekański Taser incident at Vancouver International Airport.[45]

Czech Republic

Tasers are not only legal in the Czech Republic, but vulnerable groups like pensioners and women are encouraged by the police to carry them for self-defense.[46]


In Finland possession of Taser is legal only for police officers. Police have been using Tasers since 2005. Nowadays there is a Taser in almost every patrol car.[47][48]


Tasers are used by the French National Police and Gendarmerie. In September 2008, they were made available to local police by a government decree,[49] but in September 2009, the Council of State reversed the decision judging that the specificities of the weapon required a stricter regulation and control.[50] However, since the murder of a policewoman on duty, the Taser is in use again by local police forces in 2010.


The purchase, possession, and carrying of Tasers in Germany is prohibited since April 1, 2008 (gun control law: Anlage 2, Abschnitt 1, Nr. 1.3.6. WaffG). However Tasers are in use by police SWAT teams, Spezialeinsatzkommando, (SEK) and others, in 13 out of 16 German states.


The Greek police uses Tasers. Greek Police special forces used a Taser to end the hijacking of a Turkish Airlines A310 by a Turkish citizen at Athens International Airport in March 2003.[51]

Hong Kong

Under Hong Kong laws, Chapter 238 Firearms and Ammunition Ordinance, "Any portable device which is designed or adapted to stun or disable a person by means of an electric shock applied either with or without direct contact with that person" is considered an 'arm' and therefore, the importation, possession and exportation of Tasers requires a license from the Hong Kong Police Force. They are otherwise illegal, and violation carries penalties up to a $100,000 fine and 14 years in jail.


Use of Tasers is not prohibited in Iceland.


Specialist units of Ireland's national police force (Garda Síochána) use the X26 model; Special Detective Unit, Emergency Response Unit and Regional Support Unit. Issuing Tasers to all members of the force (who are generally unarmed) is currently under consideration.[52] Use of Tasers in Ireland by private individuals is prohibited.


Israeli police approved using Tasers. As of 16 February 2009, the first Tasers became available to police units.[53]

Israeli Defense Force first usage

Tasers were first used by the Israeli Defense Force by the former special counter-terror unit Force 100 in 2004. The unit was disbanded in 2006. Tasers are expected to re-enter operational use by the Israeli Defense Forces in the near future.[54]

As of August 18, 2013, the use of Tasers by Israeli police was temporarily suspended by Police Chief Yokhanan Danino; after such instruments were used repeatedly and excessively by police; against a person who allegedly was unarmed and who was not resisting a warranted arrest. But two weeks later the Taser was unsuspended.


Under Kenya's Firearms Act, a taser is considered a firearm, as per section 2 (a) (ii) of the Act. The section offers one of the descriptions for a firearm as "a lethal barrelled weapon of any description from which any shot, bullet or other missile can be discharged or which can be adapted for the discharge of any shot, bullet or other missile and electrical charge which when it strikes any person or animal is of sufficient strength to stun and temporarily disable the person or animal struck (such weapon being commonly known as a “stun gun” or “electronic paralyser” ".[55]


Royal Malaysian Police are set to become the second in Southeast Asia police force after Singapore Police Force to use the non-lethal Taser X26 stun guns. The force had taken delivery of 210 units of the stun guns, known as the X26 electronic control device, which cost RM2.1 million. They have yet to be distributed to personnel on the ground. Tasers would be included under the Firearms Act of 1960. The Taser X26 that Malaysian police bought comes with a holster and uses a non-rechargeable lithium battery able to deliver 195 cartridge shots. Policemen on rounds are issued four cartridges. The force began exploring the idea of using Tasers in 2003 when they purchased 80 units of the M26, the X26's bulkier predecessor. This was not made public, as it was part of a testing exercise. The Tasers were issued to policemen in Petaling Jaya, Dang Wangi in Kuala Lumpur and Johor Bahru.[56]

New Zealand

A large-scale and generally well received trial by the New Zealand Police saw Tasers presented almost 800 times and fired over 100 times, but firing was "ineffective" about a third of the time.[57] The Tasers had been "unintentionally discharged" more often than they had been used in the line of duty.

In October 2012, police said the Taser had been "very successful in de-escalating dangerous and potentially life-threatening situations". Since their introduction, Tasers had been presented 1320 times but only fired 212 times, resulting in 13 injuries.[58]


Tasers and other electronic control devices are considered firearms in Sweden and are banned for civilian use. The Swedish police had purchased a limited quantity of Tasers, and was about to initiate field trials when these were cancelled in 2005 after an ethics commission found that the need for (and risks of) such devices was not firmly established.[59] The purchased Tasers were then donated to Finland, where field trials were initiated.

United Kingdom

Tasers are considered "prohibited weapons" under the Firearms Act 1968 and possession is an offence.[60] The maximum sentence for possession is ten years in prison and an unlimited fine.[61]

Taser guns are now used by some British police as a "less lethal" weapon. It was also announced in July 2007, that the deployment of Taser by specially trained police units who are not firearms officers, but who are facing similar threats of violence, would be trialled in ten police forces.[62] The 12-month trial commenced on 1 September 2007, and took place in the following forces: Avon & Somerset, Devon & Cornwall, Gwent, Lincolnshire, Merseyside, Metropolitan Police, Northamptonshire, Northumbria, North Wales and West Yorkshire.[62]

Following the completion of the trial, the Home Secretary agreed on 24 November 2008 to allow chief police officers of all forces in England and Wales, from 1 December 2008, to extend Taser use to specially trained units in accordance with current Association of Chief Police Officers policy and guidance, which states that Taser can be used only where officers would be facing violence or threats of violence of such severity that they would need to use force to protect the public, themselves, and/or the subject(s).[63]

Also, in Scotland Strathclyde Police agreed in February 2010 to arm 30 specially trained police officers using the Taser X26. The pilot would last three months and would be deployed in Glasgow City Centre and Rutherglen.[64]

A fund for up to 10,000 additional Tasers is being made available for individual chief police officers to bid for Tasers based on their own operational requirements.[63]

United States

Taser devices are not considered firearms by the United States government.[65] They can be legally carried (concealed or open) without a permit in 45 states.[66] They are prohibited to use by citizens in the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey and Rhode Island,[67] as well as certain cities and counties. Their use in Connecticut, Illinois, and Wisconsin[68] is legal with restrictions.[69]

Court cases in recent years have addressed the legality of Taser use by police officers. In Bryan v. MacPherson, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a Taser had been used in a way that constituted excessive force and hence a violation of the Fourth Amendment. In the later case Mattos v. Agarano,[70] the same Court of Appeals found that in two situations involving Taser use, one in Drive Stun and one in dart mode, officers had used excessive force. According to an article in Police Chief magazine, this decision implies guidelines for the use of Tasers and other Electronic Control Devices in gaining compliance (in a setting where safety is not an issue), including that the officer must give warning before each application, and that the suspect must be capable of compliance, with enough time to consider a warning, and to recover from the extreme pain of any prior application of the Taser; nor should Tasers be used on children, the elderly, and women who are visibly pregnant or inform the officer of their pregnancy.[71]

In 1991, a Taser supplied by Tasertron to the Los Angeles Police Department failed to subdue Rodney King—even after he was shocked twice with the device—causing officers to believe he was on PCP.[72] Its lack of effectiveness was blamed on a possible battery problem.[73]

Safety concerns

Excited delirium

Some of the deaths associated with Tasers are given a diagnosis of excited delirium, a term for a phenomenon that manifests as a combination of delirium, psychomotor agitation, anxiety, hallucinations, speech disturbances, disorientation, violent and bizarre behavior, insensitivity to pain, elevated body temperature, and increased strength.[74][75] Excited delirium is associated with sudden death (usually via cardiac or respiratory arrest) particularly following the use of physical control measures, including police restraint and Tasers.[74][75] Excited delirium most commonly arises in male subjects with a history of serious mental illness and/or acute or chronic drug abuse, particularly stimulant drugs such as cocaine.[74][76] Alcohol withdrawal or head trauma may also contribute to the condition.[77]

The diagnosis of excited delirium has been controversial.[78][79] Excited delirium has been listed as a cause of death by some medical examiners for several years,[80][81] mainly as a diagnosis of exclusion established on autopsy.[74] Additionally, academic discussion of excited delirium has been largely confined to forensic science literature, providing limited documentation about patients that survive the condition.[74] These circumstances have led some civil liberties groups to question the cause of death diagnosis, claiming that excited delirium has been used to "excuse and exonerate" law enforcement authorities following the death of detained subjects, a possible "conspiracy or cover-up for brutality" when restraining agitated individuals.[74][78][79] Also contributing to the controversy is the role of Taser use in excited delirium deaths.[76][82]

Excited delirium is not found in the current version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, however the term "excited delirium" has been accepted by the National Association of Medical Examiners and the American College of Emergency Physicians, who argued in a 2009 white paper that "excited delirium" may be described by several codes within the ICD-9.[74] The American College of Emergency Physicians "rejects the theory" that excited delirium is an "invented syndrome" used to excuse or cover-up the use of excessive force by law enforcement.[83]

Use in schools and on children

Police officers that patrol schools, including grade schools, in several U.S. states (particularly in Kansas, Minnesota, Kentucky, Virginia and Florida) have been carrying Tasers since the early 2000s. In 2004, the parents of a 6-year-old boy in Miami sued the police department for firing a Taser at their child. The police said the boy was threatening to injure his own leg with a shard of glass, and claimed that using the device was the only option to prevent the boy from injuring himself. Nevertheless, the boy's mother told CNN that the three officers involved might have found it easier to reason with her child. Two weeks later, a 12-year-old girl skipping school was Tasered in Miami-Dade.[84] In March 2008, an 11-year-old girl was shocked by a Taser.[85] In March 2009, a 15-year-old boy died in Michigan after being Tasered.[86]

Taser supporters suggest that the use in schools consists of merely switching on the device followed with threatening to use it, which can be effective in frightening violent or uncooperative students. This is the method, only if verbal reprimands have not succeeded. Critics counter that Tasers may interact with pre-existing medical complications such as medications, and may even contribute to someone's death as a result. Critics also suggest that using a Taser on a minor, particularly a young child, is effectively cruel and abusive punishment, or unnecessary.[87][88][89][90]

Use in torture

A report from a meeting of the United Nations Committee Against Torture states that "The Committee was worried that the use of Taser X26 weapons, provoking extreme pain, constituted a form of torture, and that in certain cases it could also cause death, as shown by several reliable studies and by certain cases that had happened after practical use."[91][92] Amnesty International has also raised extensive concerns about the use of other electro-shock devices by American police and in American prisons, as they can be (and according to Amnesty International, sometimes are) used to inflict cruel pain on individuals. For example, Eric Hammock of Texas died in April 2005 after receiving more than 20 Taser shocks by Fort Worth police officers.[93] Maurice Cunningham of South Carolina, while an inmate at the Lancaster County Detention Center,[94][95] was subjected to continuous shock for 2 minutes 49 seconds, which a medical examiner said caused cardiac arrhythmia and his subsequent death. He was 29 years old and had no alcohol or drugs in his system.[96]

In response to the claims that the pain inflicted by the use of the Taser could potentially constitute torture, Tom Smith, the Chairman of the Taser Board, has stated that the U.N. is "out of touch" with the needs of modern policing.

Pepper spray goes on for hours and hours, hitting someone with a baton breaks limbs, shooting someone with a firearm causes permanent damage, even punching and kicking—the intent of those tools is to inflict pain, ... with the Taser, the intent is not to inflict pain; it's to end the confrontation. When it's over, it's over.[97]
—Taser Chairman Tom Smith

The American Civil Liberties Union has also raised concerns about their use, as has the British human rights organization Resist Cardiac Arrest.

See also


  1. ^ TASER X26
  2. ^ " Neuromuscular Incapacitation (NMI)", Taser International, published March 12, 2007, accessed May 19, 2007 Archived April 13, 2008 at the Wayback Machine
  3. ^ International Association of Chiefs of Police, Electro Muscular Disruption Technology: A Nine-Step Strategy for Effective Deployment, 2005
  4. ^ "Chief's Counsel: Electronic Control Weapons: Liability Issues" By Randy Means, Attorney at Law, Thomas and Means, LLP, and Eric Edwards, Lieutenant and Legal Advisor, Phoenix Police Department, and Executive Director, Arizona Association of Chiefs of Police, The Police Chief magazine, February 2005
  5. ^ Electronic Control Weapons in Georgia: Review and Recommendations, Submitted by the Ad Hoc Committee on Electronic Control Weapons, Adopted by the Georgia Association of Chiefs of Police Executive Board June 20, 2005
  6. ^ Electronic Control Weapon Model Policy, Section 4.02J, Intergovernmental Risk Management Agency (IRMA), Adopted January 2006
  7. ^ a b Roberts, Daniel. "A new life for Taser, this time with less controversy". Writer. Fortune Magazine. Retrieved September 14, 2011. 
  8. ^ "Mounties To Curb Taser Use After Report". CBS News. Retrieved September 14, 2011. 
  9. ^ "Document – USA: Amnesty International's concerns about Taser use: Statement to the US Justice Department inquiry into deaths in custody | Amnesty International". Retrieved October 14, 2009. 
  10. ^ "Raysun X1 Multi-Mode Police Weapon". Archived from the original on 24 August 2014. Retrieved 11 May 2015. 
  11. ^ "Raysun X-1 Multi-functional Stun Gun, Stun gun, Taser gun". Archived from the original on 2 September 2012. Retrieved 11 May 2015. 
  12. ^ Langton, Jerry (December 1, 2007). "'"The dark lure of `pain compliance. Toronto Star. Retrieved December 1, 2007. 
  13. ^ Purpura, Philip P. (1996). Criminal justice : an introduction. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann. p. 187.  
  14. ^ Talvi, Silja J. A. (November 13, 2006). "Stunning Revelations". In These Times. Retrieved December 17, 2006. 
  15. ^ "Jurisdiction over the Taser Public Defender (#236)" (PDF).  
  16. ^ "Taser chief gives jurors demonstration of stun-gun blast in court". Retrieved October 14, 2009. 
  17. ^ "Corporate History". February 5, 2007. Retrieved October 14, 2009. 
  18. ^ Personal Defense Products: TASER® X26c™, TASER site. Retrieved July 16, 2013.
  19. ^ a b TASER® Cartridges: Replacement Cartridge for X26, M26, X2 & X3, TASER site. Retrieved July 16, 2013.
  20. ^ TASER Cartridges (Consumers), TASER site. Retrieved December 15, 2007.
  21. ^ "Shaped Pulse Technology".  
  22. ^ "Police batons more dangerous than Tasers: Study". 
  23. ^ Law Enforcement Advisory Committee (Summer 2005). "Less Lethal Weapons: Model Policy and Procedure for Public Safety Officers" (PDF). Michigan Municipal Risk Management Authority. Retrieved May 12, 2009. 
  24. ^ A Joint Project of PERF and COPS (April 2011). "2011 Electronic Control Weapon Guidelines" (PDF). United States Department of Justice. 
  25. ^ Michael R. Smith, J.D., Ph.D., Robert J. Kaminski, Ph.D., Geoffrey P. Alpert, Ph.D., Lorie A. Fridell, Ph.D., John MacDonald, Ph.D., Bruce Kubu (July 2010). "A Multi-Method Evaluation of Police Use of Force Outcomes" (PDF). National Institute of Justice. Retrieved October 10, 2011. 
  26. ^ Use of the Taser, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
  27. ^ "Amnesty International's concerns about Tasers". Retrieved October 14, 2009. 
  28. ^ "TASER International – Investors – RSS Content". July 1, 2009. Retrieved October 14, 2009. 
  29. ^ "New Taser Can Shock 3 People Without Reload: Special Coverage: Stun Guns at". July 28, 2009. Retrieved October 14, 2009. 
  30. ^ "Taser Cam". Retrieved October 14, 2009. 
  31. ^ a b The Taser Effect: Two years after HPD armed itself with the stun guns, questions linger over how and how often the weapon is being used Jan. 14, 2007
  32. ^ How the Taser Works Dec 2007
  33. ^ "Unregulated Use of Taser Stun Guns Threatens Lives, ACLU of Northern California Study Finds".  
  34. ^ "Amnesty International Urges Stricter Limits on Police Taser Use as U.S. Death Toll Reaches 500". Amnesty International. February 15, 2012. 
  35. ^ "Home". TASER. Retrieved October 14, 2009. 
  36. ^ "Tras la polémica por las armas eléctricas, una jueza porteña prohibió que la ciudad las utilice". Retrieved 11 May 2015. 
  37. ^ "Tasers rollout for SA police". ABC News. Retrieved 11 May 2015. 
  38. ^ Hosking, Wes (June 30, 2010). "Country police equipped with Tasers from Sunday in trial run".  
  39. ^ Gerhard Brenner (September 10, 2012). "Taser als Dienstwaffe" (PDF). 
  40. ^ Giroday, Gabrielle (24 May 2007). "Police investigate after Taser loaned to doughnut worker". Winnipeg Free Press. Archived from the original on 26 May 2007. 
  41. ^ MacCharles, Tonda (June 28, 2008). "Taser use could put police under fire".  
  42. ^ "Compliance Strategy Group". Compliance Strategy Group. Retrieved October 14, 2009. 
  43. ^ Kiedrowski Report
  44. ^ "An Independent Review of the Adoption and Use of Conducted Energy Weapons by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police". September 12, 2008. Retrieved December 26, 2008. 
  45. ^ "Transcripts – Braidwood Inquiry". Retrieved December 26, 2008. 
  46. ^ "Prevence přepadení" [Prevention of assault] (in Czech). Policie České republiky – KŘP Královéhradeckého kraje (Police of the Czech Republic - Hradec Kralove region KRP). 
  47. ^ (Finnish)
  48. ^ (Finnish)
  49. ^ "Les policiers municipaux bientôt autorisés à utiliser le Taser". AFP. Retrieved September 14, 2008. 
  50. ^ "le Conseil d'Etat annule le décret autorisant la police municipale à utiliser le taser".  
  51. ^ "TASER International, Inc. commends Greek Police Special Forces on use of Advanced Taser M26 to arrest Turkish Airlines Flight 160 hijacker". TASER International. Retrieved June 9, 2007. 
  52. ^ Cusack, Jim (12 May 2013). "Gardai may be issued with stun guns as assaults rise". Irish Independent. Retrieved 7 May 2014. 
  53. ^ "המשטרה מציגה: שוטרים מחשמלים". Maariv. 
  54. ^ "Taser Electric Shock Gun to Be Used in IDF". IDF. 
  55. ^ Kenya Law Reports. "The Firearms Act" (PDF). International Committee of the Red Cros. National Council for Law Reporting. p. 5. Retrieved 31 August 2015. 
  56. ^ "Taser X26 stun guns in use soon".  
  57. ^ "The shocking truth about Tasers". 2011. Retrieved July 17, 2011. Figures obtained by the  
  58. ^ "Tasers 'extremely useful': police". 3 News NZ. 29 October 2012. 
  59. ^ "Etiska rådet säger nej till elpistol". 2005. Retrieved October 12, 2011.  
  60. ^ "The National Police Chiefs Council (NPCC)" (PDF). Retrieved 11 May 2015. 
  61. ^ Schedule 6 to the Firearms Act 1968
  62. ^ a b "Police to be allowed wider use of Tasers". Reuters. July 19, 2007. Retrieved January 29, 2010. 
  63. ^ a b Leppard, David (November 23, 2008). "Police to get 10,000 Taser guns". London: Times Online. Retrieved May 8, 2009. 
  64. ^ "Strathclyde Police allowed to carry tasers". Strathclyde Police Force. Retrieved March 27, 2010. 
  65. ^ "In depth: Tasers". CBC News. Retrieved November 12, 2007. 
  66. ^ "TASER Laws". World Net Enterprises, Inc., Murfreesboro, TN, USA Copyright © 2003-2013 World Net Enterprises, Inc. Retrieved October 10, 2013. 
  67. ^ "RI Law Title 11 Chapter 11–47 Section 11-47-42". State of RI General Assembly. Retrieved October 27, 2009. 
  68. ^ "Wisconsin Statute 175.60". Wisconsin State Legislature. Retrieved 7 March 2012. 
  69. ^ "Taser C2, C2 Taser, Less-than-Lethal Weapons, Non-Lethal Weapons". Archived from the original on April 29, 2008. Retrieved October 14, 2009. 
  70. ^ United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. "Mattos v. Agarano" (PDF) 
  71. ^ Eric P. Daigle (January 2012). "Electronic Control Devices: Where Are We Now?". The Police Chief 79 
  72. ^ "Officer's lawyer says darts used of King are missing". Daily News (Los Angeles). April 28, 1991. 
  73. ^ Riordan, Teresa (November 17, 2003). "TECHNOLOGY; New Taser Finds Unexpected Home In Hands of Police".  
  74. ^ a b c d e f g "White Paper Report on Excited Delirium Syndrome", ACEP Excited Delirium Task Force, American College of Emergency Physicians, September 10, 2009
  75. ^ a b Grant JR, Southall PE, Mealey J, Scott SR, Fowler DR (March 2009). "Excited delirium deaths in custody: past and present". Am J Forensic Med Pathol 30 (1): 1–5.  
  76. ^ a b Ruth SoRelle (October 2010). "ExDS Protocol Puts Clout in EMS Hands". Emergency Medicine News 32 (10): 1, 32.  
  77. ^ Samuel E, Williams RB, Ferrell RB (2009). "Excited delirium: Consideration of selected medical and psychiatric issues". Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 5: 61–6.  
  78. ^ a b "Death by Excited Delirium: Diagnosis or Coverup?".  
  79. ^ a b "Excited Delirium: Police Brutality vs. Sheer Insanity".  
  80. ^ "Suspects' deaths blamed on 'excited delirium', critics dispute rare syndrome usually diagnosed when police are involved".  
  81. ^ "Excited delirium, not Taser, behind death of N.S. man: medical examiner".  
  82. ^ "Tasers Implicated in Excited Delirium Deaths".  
  83. ^ Mark L. DeBard, MD (November 2009). "Identifying New Disease as Excited Delirium Syndrome Rejects Idea that Police Brutality Causes Deaths". Emergency Medicine News 31 (11): 3, 5.  
  84. ^ CNN, Susan Candiotti, contributor. Police review policy after Tasers used on kids November 15, 2004
  85. ^ "Officials: Deputy Shocks Girl, 11, With Taser At Elementary School". March 27, 2008. Retrieved October 14, 2009. 
  86. ^ Associated Press (March 23, 2009). "Michigan 15-year-old Dies After Police Tase Him". Retrieved October 14, 2009. 
  87. ^ Kansas Students Speak Out Against Tasers In Schools Apr. 6, 2006
  88. ^ Teen dies after being shot by stun gun Nov. 1, 2006
  89. ^ "Tasers Implicated in Excited Delirium Deaths". NPR, February 27, 2007
  90. ^ "More UK police to get stun guns".  
  91. ^ Committee against Torture Concludes Thirty-Ninth Session, press release, United Nations Office at Geneva, November 23, 2007. Retrieved 26 November 2007. Archived May 28, 2008 at the Wayback Machine
  92. ^ "Tasers a form of torture, says UN".  
  93. ^ "Electro-shock weapons", Supplementary Briefing to the UN Committee Against Torture, Chapter 9.1., p.38, USA Amnesty International, AI Index: AMR 51/061/2006
  94. ^ "Taser Blamed for Inmate's Death".  
  95. ^ "Officers used tasers, baton on inmate". Associated Press. July 28, 2005. Archived from the original on 6 November 2009. Retrieved November 8, 2008. 
  96. ^ Amnesty International’s continuing concerns about Taser use 2006
  97. ^ "UN 'out of touch' on torture: Taser boss".  

External links

  • Tasers in medicine: an irreverent call for proposals—editorial in Canadian Medical Association Journal by Matthew B. Stanbrook, MD PhD, 2008
  • Taser Laws by state and city, local and state—by Ryan R. Karpilo, 2012
  • The Use of Conducted Energy Devices (Tasers) TELEMASP Bulletin, Texas Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics Program

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.