World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Patent war

Article Id: WHEBN0036647856
Reproduction Date:

Title: Patent war  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Kevlar, Wright brothers patent war, Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Patent law, History of television
Collection: Legal Disputes, Patent Law
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Patent war

A patent war is a "battle" between corporations or individuals to secure patents for litigation, whether offensively or defensively. There are ongoing patent wars between the world's largest technology and software corporations. Contemporary patent wars are a global phenomenon, fought by multinational corporations based in the United States, China, Europe, Japan, Korea and Taiwan. The companies involved include Yahoo, Barnes & Noble, ZTE, AOL, Ericsson, Apple Inc., EMC, Foxconn, HTC, Facebook, InterDigital, IBM, Microsoft, LG Corp, Kodak, Halliburton, Nokia, Motorola, Nortel, Oracle, Samsung, Pantech, Gemalto, Openwave, VIA Technologies and Research In Motion.[1][2][3] Patent wars have occurred in a wide range of technologies, both in the past and in the present.


Patent wars are not a new phenomenon. In the Wright brothers patent war, the Wright brothers, attributed with the invention of the airplane, sought to prevent competitors from manufacturing airplanes through litigation, stifling the development of the American airline industry.[4] Alexander Graham Bell, credited with inventing the telephone, was dragged into a patent war against his rivals, which involved, in just 11 years, 600 lawsuits.[5] One notable case was Bell's lawsuit against Western Union. Western Union was backed by Elisha Gray, also credited with inventing the telephone.[5]

The occurrence of patent wars has been shaped by the digital age, as the rapid pace of innovation makes much of the patent system obsolete.[6] In the 1980s, technology corporations in the United States and Japan engaged in a patent war, creating a scenario where companies were forced to "fight patent with patent." This bilateral patent war, partly exaggerated by the media, subsided by the mid 1990s.[7]

Exacerbating the frequency of patent wars was the advent of patent trolling. The term "patent troll" was coined in the 1990s by the employees of Intel and popularized by Intel's Peter Detkin. According to Detkin, Intel was "sued for libel for the use of the term 'patent extortionists' so I came up with 'patent trolls...a patent troll is somebody who tries to make a lot of money off a patent that they are not practicing and have no intention of practicing and in most cases never practiced."[8]

During the 1990s, federal courts began reversing earlier decisions made by the patent office that restricted the patenting of software.[9] In 1997, software companies Trend Micro, Integralis, McAffee and Symantec fought a patent war over antivirus software.[10][11] In 1999, a patent for "one-click ordering technology" led to a patent war between and Barnes & Noble.[12][13] In 2004, Sony and Kodak engaged in a patent war over digital cameras,[14] a dispute which lasted until 2007.[15]

The current smartphone wars started in the late 2000s. According to PC Magazine, Apple brought the patent wars to the smartphone market by its desire to "go thermonuclear" on Google's competing Android operating system for mobile devices.[3] This triggered a "war" between major technology companies in the mobile market.[3] Apple has been accused of having links to the company Digitude Innovations, which has been labeled as a patent troll.[16] Following this warfare, Apple itself has also been called a patent-troll.[17]

Alexander Graham Bell was involved in a patent war over the invention of the telephone.

Effects and response

Patents are intended to protect intellectual property and encourage innovation, granting innovative companies a temporary competitive advantage over their rivals; however, patents have been used offensively through threats of litigation. This forces companies to allocate time and money that could have been better spent on research and development.[9] Businessweek has written that "only lawyers win in patent wars."[6]

There are numerous proposals aimed at reducing the risk of patent wars. Twitter announced in 2012 an "Innovator's Patent Agreement" promising not to use its patents opportunistically and without the consent of the company's employees.[18] There have been commentators favoring abolishing patents entirely, outside of the industries that require them.[19]


  1. ^ Rowinski, Dan (1 June 2012). "Patent Wars Turn Tech into a Battlefield". ReadWriteWeb. Retrieved 6 August 2012. 
  2. ^ Francis, Theo (2 August 2012). "Can You Get A Patent On Being A Patent Troll?". NPR. Retrieved 6 August 2012. 
  3. ^ a b c Sascha, Segan (19 January 2012). "Infographic: Smartphone Patent Wars Explained". PC Magazine. Retrieved 6 August 2012. 
  4. ^ Lohr, Steve (30 July 2012). "Apple-Samsung Trial Highlights Tricky Patent Wars". The New York Times. 
  5. ^ a b Anton A. Huurdeman (31 July 2003). The Worldwide History of Telecommunications. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 176–177.  
  6. ^ a b Popelka, Larry (24 April 2012). "Only Lawyers Win in Patent Wars". Businessweek. Retrieved 6 August 2012. 
  7. ^ Ove Granstrand (1 October 2000). The Economics and Management of Intellectual Property: Towards Intellectual Capitalism. Edward Elgar Publishing. pp. 140–141.  
  8. ^ Sandburg, Brenda (30 July 2001). "Inventor's lawyer makes a pile from patents". The Recorder. 
  9. ^ a b "When Patents Attack". NPR. 22 July 2011. Retrieved 8 August 2012. 
  10. ^ Galante, Suzanne (8 July 1997). "Trend Micro wages patent war". CNET. Retrieved 6 August 2012. 
  11. ^ Galante, Suzanne (29 August 1997). "Symantec retreats in antivirus war". CNET. Retrieved 6 August 2012. 
  12. ^ Adam Cohen (3 June 2003). The Perfect Store: Inside eBay. Hachette Inc. p. 90.  
  13. ^ Richard Spinello (6 July 2010). Cyberethics: Morality and Law in Cyberspace. Jones & Bartlett Publishers. pp. 170–173.  
  14. ^ "Digital camera patent war hots up". BBC. 1 April 2004. Retrieved 6 August 2012. 
  15. ^ "Kodak and Sony end patent dispute over digital photography inventions". New York TImes. 3 January 2007. Retrieved 6 August 2012. 
  16. ^ Kincaid, Jason (9 December 2011). "Apple Made A Deal With The Devil (No, Worse: A Patent Troll)". Techcrunch. Retrieved 6 August 2012. 
  17. ^ Wilcox, Joe. "Apple is a patent-troll now.". Retrieved 20 December 2012. 
  18. ^ Laird, Sam (18 April 2012). "Is Twitter trying to end the tech patent wars?". CNN. Retrieved 6 August 2012. 
  19. ^ Wadhwa, Vivek (7 August 2010). "Why We Need To Abolish Software Patents". Techcrunch. Retrieved 8 August 2012. 
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.