World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Genetically modified tree

Article Id: WHEBN0041083964
Reproduction Date:

Title: Genetically modified tree  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Genetic engineering, Forestry, Plant expressed vaccine, Enviropig, Cisgenesis
Collection:
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Genetically modified tree

Technician checks on genetically modified peach and apple "orchards". Each dish holds experimental trees grown from lab-cultured cells to which researchers have given new genes. Source: USDA.

A genetically modified tree (GMt, GM tree, genetically engineered tree, GE tree or transgenic tree) is a tree whose DNA has been modified using genetic engineering techniques. In most cases the aim is to introduce a novel trait to the plant which does not occur naturally within the species. Examples include resistance to certain pests, diseases, environmental conditions, and herbicide tolerance, or the alteration of lignin levels in order to reduce pulping costs.

Genetically modified approved ("deregulated") for commercial use, with the exception of insect-resistant poplar trees in China.[1][2] Several genetically modified forest tree species are undergoing field trials for deregulation, and much of the research is being carried out by the pulp and paper industry, primarily with the intention of increasing the productivity of existing tree stock.[3] Certain genetically modified orchard tree species have been deregulated for commercial use in the United States including the papaya and plum.[4] The development, testing and use of GM trees remains at an early stage in comparison to GM crops.[5]

Research

Research into genetically modified trees has been ongoing since 1988.[6] Concerns surrounding the biosafety implications of releasing genetically modified trees into the wild have held back regulatory approval of GM forest trees. This concern is exemplified in the Convention on Biological Diversity's stance:

A precondition for further commercialization of GM forest trees is likely to be their complete sterility.[5][8] Plantation trees remain phenotypically similar to their wild cousins in that most are the product of no more than three generations of artificial selection, therefore, the risk of transgene escape by pollination with compatible wild species is high.[9] One of the most credible science based concerns with GM trees is their potential for wide dispersal of seed and pollen.[10] The fact that pine pollen travels long distances is well established, moving up to 3,000 kilometers from its source.[11] Additionally, many tree species reproduce for a long time before being harvested.[12] In combination these factors have led some to believe that GM trees are worthy of special environmental considerations over GM crops.[13] Ensuring sterility for GM trees has proven elusive, but efforts are being made.[14] While tree geneticist Steve Strauss predicted that complete containment might be possible by 2020, many questions remain.[15]

Proposed uses

GM trees under experimental development have been modified with traits intended to provide benefit to industry, foresters or consumers. Due to high regulatory and research costs, the majority of genetically modified trees in silviculture consist of plantation trees, such as eucalyptus, poplar, and pine.[16]

Lignin alteration

Several companies in the pulp and paper industry are interested in utilizing GM technology to alter the lignin content of plantation trees. It is estimated that reducing lignin in plantation trees by genetic modification could reduce pulping costs by up to $15 per cubic metre.[17] Lignin removal from wood fibres conventionally relies on costly and environmentally hazardous chemicals.[18] By developing low-lignin GM trees it is hoped that pulping and bleaching processes will require fewer inputs,[19] therefore, mills supplied by low-lignin GM trees may have a reduced impact on their surrounding ecosystems and communities.[20] However, it is argued that reductions in lignin may compromise the structural integrity of the plant, thereby making it more susceptible to pathogens and disease,[21] which could necessitate pesticide use exceeding that on traditional plantations.[22]

Frost tolerance

Genetic modification can allow trees to cope with MeadWestvaco (US) and International Paper (US)[25] is leading this research.[26] Until now the cultivation of eucalyptus has only been possible on the southern tip of Florida, freeze-tolerance would substantially extend the cultivation range northwards.[27]

Accelerated growth

In Brazil, field trials of fast growing GM eucalyptus are currently underway, they are set to conclude in 2015-2016 with commercialization to result.[28] FuturaGene, a biotechnology company owned by Suzano, a Brazilian pulp and paper company, has been leading this research. Stanley Hirsch, chief executive of FuturaGene has stated: "Our trees grow faster and thicker. We are ahead of everyone. We have shown we can increase the yields and growth rates of trees more than anything grown by traditional breeding."[29] The company is looking to reduce harvest cycles from 7 to 5.5 years with 20-30% more mass than conventional eucalyptus.[29] There is concern that such objectives may further exacerbate the negative impacts of plantation forestry. Increased water and soil nutrient demand from faster growing species may lead to irrecoverable losses in site productivity and further impinge upon neighbouring communities and ecosystems.[30][31][32]

Disease resistance

Ecologically motivated research into genetic modification is underway. There are ongoing schemes that aim to foster disease resistance in trees such as the American chestnut[33] (see Chestnut blight) and the English elm[34] (see Dutch elm disease) for the purpose of their reintroduction to the wild. Specific diseases have reduced the populations of these emblematic species to the extent that they are mostly lost in the wild. Genetic modification is being pursued concurrently with traditional breeding techniques in an attempt to endow these species with disease resistance.[35]

Current uses

Poplars in China

In 2002 China's State Forestry Administration approved GM poplar trees for commercial use.[36] Subsequently 1.4 million Bt (insecticide) producing GM poplars were planted in China. They were planted both for their wood and as part of China's 'Green Wall' project, which aims to impede desertification.[37] Reports indicate that the GM poplars have spread beyond the area of original planting [38] and that contamination of native poplars with the Bt gene is occurring.[39] There is concern with these developments, particularly because the pesticide producing trait may impart a positive selective advantage on the poplar, allowing it a high level of invasiveness.[40]

See also

References

  1. ^
  2. ^
  3. ^
  4. ^
  5. ^ a b
  6. ^
  7. ^
  8. ^
  9. ^
  10. ^
  11. ^
  12. ^
  13. ^
  14. ^
  15. ^
  16. ^
  17. ^
  18. ^
  19. ^
  20. ^
  21. ^
  22. ^
  23. ^
  24. ^
  25. ^
  26. ^
  27. ^
  28. ^
  29. ^ a b
  30. ^
  31. ^
  32. ^
  33. ^
  34. ^
  35. ^ Powell, William (march 2014) "the American Chestnut's Genetic Rebirth", Scientific American, Volume 310, Number 3, Page 52
  36. ^
  37. ^
  38. ^
  39. ^
  40. ^


This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 



Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.