World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

English usage controversies

Article Id: WHEBN0000387041
Reproduction Date:

Title: English usage controversies  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: List of English words with disputed usage, Disputes in English grammar, Conjunction (grammar), English irregular verbs, English modal verbs
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

English usage controversies

In English, numerous grammatical constructions are in dispute. In each dispute, a significant number of English speakers identify a given construction as incorrect while a significant number of different English speakers identify it as correct. Differences in rules between formal and informal speech, and also between dialects, often enter such disputes; informal speech or non-standard dialects are sometimes simply labelled as incorrect. Correct use of a given register or dialect may be seen as markers of education, culture, group identity, or respect. Various proscriptive authorities, such as style guides and teachers, make pronouncements on the correctness of many constructions; disputes arise when these authorities disagree with each other, or with actual usage by a population of speakers.


  • Examples 1
  • Factors in disputes 2
  • Prescription and description 3
  • Different forms of English 4
    • English internationally 4.1
    • Regional dialects and ethnolects 4.2
    • Register 4.3
  • See also 5
  • References 6
  • Further reading 7


Some of the following examples are considered by some sources to be acceptable in dialects other than Standard English or in an informal register; others consider certain constructions to be incorrect in any variety of English.

  • Generic you – e.g. "Brushing your teeth is a good habit." as opposed to "Brushing one's teeth is a good habit"[1][2]
  • Split infinitives – e.g. "To boldly go where no man has gone before." as opposed to "To go boldly where no man has gone before"[3]
  • Conjunction beginning a sentence – e.g. "But Mom said not to jump on the bed!"[4][5]
  • Double genitive – e.g. "a friend of theirs" as opposed to "a friend of them" or "their friend"[6]
  • Using "me" vs. "I" in the subject complement ("It is me." as opposed to "It is I.") or other cases - e.g. "Me and Bob" vs. "Bob and I"[7]
It's me again.

Several proscriptions concern matters mainly of writing style and clarity but not grammatical correctness:

  • Dangling modifiers (including dangling participles) are often cited as potentially causing confusion.[14]
  • Various style guides warn writers to avoid[15] and not to avoid[16] the passive voice.
  • Gender neutrality in English is a consideration topic in several ways:
    • Gender-specific and gender-neutral pronouns - Replacing masculine pronouns like "he" where they are meant to refer to a person of either gender with "he or she", alternative phrasing, or grammatically controversial gender-neutral personal pronouns such as the singular they[17] or newly invented words like "hir" and "ze"
    • Terms for humans in general - Replacing nouns like "mankind" with "humankind"
    • Gender marking in job titles - Replacing nouns like "chairman" and "manpower" with alternatives like "chairperson" and "staffing levels"
    • Married and maiden names - Whether or not women (and men) should change their names after marriage
    • Use of Ms. for equality with Mr., as opposed to Miss and Mrs. which do not have male equivalents

For an alphabetical list of disputes concerning a single word or phrase, see List of English words with disputed usage.

Factors in disputes

The following circumstances may feature in disputes:

Myths and superstitions
There are a number of alleged "rules" of unclear origin that have no rational basis or are based on things such as misremembered rules taught in school. They are sometimes described by authorities as "superstitions" or "myths". These include "rules" such as not beginning sentences with "and"[18]:69 or "because"[18]:125–6 or not ending them with prepositions[19]:617
No central authority
Unlike some languages, such as French (which has the Académie française), English has no single authoritative governing academy, so assessments of correctness are made by "self-appointed authorities who, reflecting varying judgments of acceptability and appropriateness, often disagree".[20]:14
While some variations in the use of language correlate with age, sex, ethnic group, or region, other forms may be taught in schools and be preferred in the context of interaction with strangers. These forms may also gain prestige as the standard language of professionals, politicians, etc., and be referred to as "standard English", whereas forms associated more with less educated speakers may be referred to as "nonstandard" (or, less commonly "substandard") English.[20]:18
The prescriptivist tradition may affect attitudes toward certain uses and thus the preferences of some speakers.[20]:14
Because of the stigma attached to violating prescriptivist norms, some speakers – attempting to avoid mistakes – may incorrectly extend the rules beyond their valid scope.[20]:14
Use by widely respected authors may lend credibility to a particular construction: for instance, Ernest Hemingway is known for beginning sentences with And.[21]
Classical languages
Prescriptivist arguments about the correctness of various English constructions have sometimes been based on the grammar of Latin.[22]:9
Analogy with other constructions
Sometimes, it will be argued that a certain use is more logical than another, or that it is more consistent with other usages, based on analogy with different grammatical constructions. For instance it may be argued that the accusative form must be used for the components of a co-ordinate construction where it would be used for a single pronoun.[22]:9

Speakers and writers frequently do not consider it necessary to justify their positions on a particular use, taking it for granted that a given use is correct or incorrect. In some cases, people believe an expression to be incorrect partly because they also falsely believe it to be newer than it really is.[23]

Prescription and description

The difference between prescriptivist and descriptivist approaches is often described as being that the former prescribes how English should be spoken and written and the latter describes how English is spoken and written, but this is an oversimplification.[22]:5 Prescriptivist works deal with topics other than grammar, such as recommendations on style, but they may also contain statements about purported incorrectness of various common English constructions.[22]:6 Prescriptivists and descriptivists differ in that when presented with evidence that purported rules disagree with the actual usage of most native speakers, the prescriptivist may declare that those speakers are wrong, whereas the descriptivist will assume that the usage of the overwhelming majority of native speakers defines the language, and that the prescriptivist has an idiosyncratic view of correct usage.[22]:7–8 Particularly in older prescriptivist works, recommendations may be based on personal taste, confusion between informality and ungrammaticality,[22]:6 or arguments related to other languages, such as Latin.[22]:9

Different forms of English

English internationally

English is spoken worldwide, and the Standard Written English grammar generally taught in schools around the world will vary only slightly. Nonetheless, disputes can sometimes arise: for example, in India it is a matter of some debate whether British, American, or Indian English is the best form for use.[24][25]

Regional dialects and ethnolects

In contrast to their generally high level of tolerance for the dialects of other English-speaking countries, speakers often express disdain for features of certain regional or ethnic dialects, such as Southern American English's use of y'all, Geordies' use of "yous" as the second person plural personal pronoun, and non-standard forms of "to be" such as "The old dock bes under water most of the year" (Newfoundland English) or "That dock be under water every other week" (African-American Vernacular English). Such disdain may not be restricted to points of grammar; speakers often criticize regional accents and vocabulary as well. Arguments related to regional dialects must center on questions of what constitutes Standard English. For example, since fairly divergent dialects from many countries are accepted widely as Standard English, it is not always clear why certain regional dialects, which may be very similar to their standard counterparts, are not.


Different constructions are acceptable in different registers of English. For example, a given construction will often be seen as too formal or too informal for a situation.

See also


  1. ^ [3] lists "one; anyone; people in general" as a definition without qualification that it is non-standard
  2. ^ [4] requires replacing "you" with another word unless it means "you the reader".
  3. ^ Robert Allen, ed. (2002). "Split infinitive".   "No other grammatical issue has so divided English speakers since the split infinitive was declared to be a solecism in the 19c [19th century]: raise the subject of English usage in any conversation today and it is sure to be mentioned."
  4. ^
  5. ^ University of Chicago (2010). The Chicago Manual of Style (16th ed.). Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press. p. 257.  
  6. ^ Quinion, Michael. "Double Possessive". World Wide Words. Retrieved 2009-05-19. 
  7. ^  
  8. ^ " Usage Note"Ain't I" vs. "Aren't I?"".  
  9. ^ "less, fewer". Merriam-Webster's dictionary of English usage (2nd ed.). Merriam-Webster. 1995. p. 592.  
  10. ^ Kenneth G. Wilson, "Double Modal Auxiliaries", The Columbia Guide to Standard American English, 1993.
  11. ^
  12. ^
  13. ^
  14. ^ McArthur, Tom, ed. The Oxford Companion to the English Language, pp. 752-753. Oxford University Press, 1992, ISBN 0-19-214183-X The dangling modifier or participle
  15. ^ The Elements of Style, 1918
  16. ^ A Dictionary of Modern English Usage, 1926; Politics and the English Language, 1946
  17. ^ Chicago Manual of Style, 13th edition, (1983): p. 233.
  18. ^ a b Merriam-Webster's Concise Dictionary of English Usage. Penguin. 2002.  
  19. ^ Fowler, H.W.; Burchfield, R.W. (1996). The New Fowler's Modern English Usage. Oxford University Press.  
  20. ^ a b c d  
  21. ^ Call for Papers on Hemingway's influence on grammar
  22. ^ a b c d e f g  
  23. ^ Freeman, Jan (9 October 2005). "Losing our illusions".  
  24. ^ Hohenthal, Annika (5 June 2001). "The Model for English in India – the Informants' Views". 
  25. ^ Limerick, James (2002). "English in a global context". Victoria University. 

Further reading

  • Robert Lane Greene (2011). You Are What You Speak: Grammar Grouches, Language Laws, and the Politics of Identity.  
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.